evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

331 questions · 346 findings · 26 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 118 · 34.1%GRADE not reported 22 · 6.4%Very low 112 · 32.4%Low 62 · 17.9%Moderate 23 · 6.6%High 9 · 2.6%

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in successful reperfusion (mTICI 2b to 3) postprocedure compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

All‐cause mortality within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in intracranial hemorrhage on imaging at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage at · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage at 24 hours compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Thrombo‐aspiration alone vs stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone

Procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months · people with acute ischemic stroke

Thrombo‐aspiration alone showed no clear difference in procedure‐related adverse events within 3 months compared with stent‐retrieval thrombectomy alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes activities of daily living: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Prism adaptation training vs control

Neglect outcomes: immediate effects · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIBS vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes activities of daily living: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

NIBS vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

NIBS vs control

Neglect outcomes: immediate effects · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes neglect outcomes: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

2 findings from 1 review