Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

601 questions · 628 findings · 58 reviews

No studies found 131 · 20.9%GRADE not reported 92 · 14.6%Very low 167 · 26.6%Low 143 · 22.8%Moderate 76 · 12.1%High 19 · 3%

Any topical or systemic intervention (topical/systemic steroids, ciclosporin, tacrolimus, retinoids, anti-malarials, biologics, phototherapy, surgery) vs Placebo, no treatment, another active intervention, or a different dose of the same intervention

Eating a normally varied diet · People of any age with erosive lichen planus affecting the oral, anogenital, and/or oesophageal regions

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control

Number of participantswith at least one recurrent adenoma · people with a history of colorectal adenomas

Dietary fibre (all study interventions) showed no clear difference in number of participantswith at least one recurrent adenoma compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control

Number of participantswith at least one adenoma 1 cm or greater · people with a history of colorectal adenomas

Dietary fibre (all study interventions) showed no clear difference in number of participantswith at least one adenoma 1 cm or greater compared with control (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Culturally adapted health literacy skills building course vs no/unrelated health literacy intervention

Health behaviour – Time point a: short‐term (up to 1 month post‐intervention) Multiple outcomes assessed and multiple measures used: (1) Fat‐related dietary habits Fat‐Related Diet Habits Questionnaire (score · migrants
1 finding from 1 review