Cochrane · systematic review · CD003430
Dietary fibre for the prevention of recurrent colorectal adenomas and carcinomas
Yao, Y, Suo, T, Andersson, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
ColorectalAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
4
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 100%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Dietary fibre (all study interventions) versus control for the prevention of colorectal adenomas and carcinomas
Population: people with a history of colorectal adenomas
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Number of participantswith at least one recurrent adenoma Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control | RR 1.04 [0.95, 1.13] | 5 studies · 3641 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |
Number of participantswith more than one adenoma Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control | RR 1.06 [0.94, 1.2] | 2 studies · 2542 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |
Number of participantswith at least one adenoma 1 cm or greater Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control | RR 0.99 [0.82, 1.2] | 4 studies · 3224 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness |
Number of participantsdiagnosed with colorectal cancer Dietary fibre (all study interventions) vs control | RR 2.7 [1.07, 6.85] | 2 studies · 2794 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision |