Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

451 questions · 479 findings · 42 reviews · Stroke

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 147 · 30.7%GRADE not reported 22 · 4.6%Very low 130 · 27.1%Low 103 · 21.5%Moderate 60 · 12.5%High 17 · 3.5%

Mirror therapy vs other interventions

Pain at the end of intervention phase: all studies

1 finding from 1 review

Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 248 participants
Low

Mirror therapy vs other interventions

Pain at the end of intervention phase after excluding studies with CRPS

1 finding from 1 review

Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 176 participants
Moderate

Mirror therapy vs other interventions

Visuospatial neglect at the end of intervention: all studies

1 finding from 1 review

Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 175 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

ADL outcome · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
27 studies · 3423 participants
Moderate
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 540 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

ADL outcome · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 260 participants
Moderate
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Motor function scales Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
13 studies · 967 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Motor function scales Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 160 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Balance ( · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 246 participants
Moderate
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Gait velocity Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
14 studies · 1126 participants
High

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Gait velocity Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
5 studies · 214 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs usual care or attention control

Length of stay · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 105 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Motor function scales Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
25 studies · 4558 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Motor function scales Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
8 studies · 1829 participants
Moderate

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Balance ( · people with stroke

2 findings from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low
Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Very low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Gait velocity Immediate outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 292 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Gait velocity Persisting outcome · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 271 participants
Low

Summary of findings: intervention vs no treatment

Length of stay · people with stroke

1 finding from 1 review

Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 318 participants
Low

Prism adaptation training vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes activities of daily living: immediate effects compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.2
5 studies · 158 participants
Very low
Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 39 participants
Very low

Prism adaptation training vs control

Neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post intervention · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether prism adaptation training changes neglect outcomes: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.05
1 study · 16 participants
Very low

NIBS vs control

Activities of daily living · spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other adult‐acquired non‐progressive brain injury

It is very uncertain whether NIBS changes activities of daily living: effects persisting at least 1 month post… compared with any control (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.35
3 studies · 92 participants
Very low
Non‐pharmacological interventions for spatial neglect or inattention following stroke and other non‐progressive brain… 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
SMD 0.61
6 studies · 160 participants
Very low