CI: Confidence interval · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Donning and doffing errors · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
CI: Confidence interval · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Donning and doffing errors · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse effects · asbestos workers
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Sharps injuries, · healthcare workers
It is very uncertain whether educational intervention changes sharps injuries, compared with no intervention (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.68 [0.48, 0.95]
395 participants
Very low
Needle stick injuries · healthcare workers
Educational intervention showed no clear difference in needle stick injuries, questionnaires, 6 mo (RCT) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
4 findings from 1 review
RR 0.53 [0.21, 1.35]
167 participants
Low
RR 0.91 [0.38, 2.2]
529 participants
Low
RR 0.41 [0.14, 1.21]
168 participants
Low
Show 1 more finding
RR 0.46 [0.16, 1.3]
529 participants
Low
Injury rate (ITS), change immediately after intervention, low injury rate · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2104 participants
Very low
Injury rate (ITS), change immediately after intervention, high injury rate · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
255 participants
Very low
Injury rate (ITS), change in trend before and after intervention, low injury rate · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2104 participants
Very low
Injury rate (ITS), change in trend before and after intervention, high injury rate · healthcare workers
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
255 participants
Very low
Health Service Utilisation · healthy individuals and those with a pre‐existing health condition
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
2948 participants
Very low
Respiratory exacerbations · healthy individuals and those with a pre‐existing health condition
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life · healthy individuals and those with a pre‐existing health condition
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Serious adverse events · healthy individuals and those with a pre‐existing health condition
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes · children (aged 0–2 years)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Adverse events · children (aged 0–6 years)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
2 findings from 1 review
Blood lead levels (continuous)Blood lead level at end of duration Scale: 0–30 · children (aged 0–6 years)
2 findings from 1 review
Cognitive and neurobehavioural outcomes · children (aged 0–4 years)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found