Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

677 questions · 719 findings · 133 reviews

No studies found 153 · 21.3%GRADE not reported 54 · 7.5%Very low 164 · 22.8%Low 199 · 27.7%Moderate 119 · 16.6%High 30 · 4.2%

COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) vs COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term)

Leaving the study early · Adolescents with psychosis

It is very uncertain whether COMPUTER‐ASSISTED COGNITIVE REMEDIATION PROGRAMME (CACR) changes leaving the study early: For any reason compared with COMPUTER GAMES (CG, all short‐term) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs mometasone furoate ointment

Primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms · people with moderate to severe chronic relapsing dyshidrotic eczema on hands

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs mometasone furoate ointment

Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people with moderate to severe chronic relapsing dyshidrotic eczema on hands

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs vehicle

Primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand eczema) and proven by…

Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment probably leads to higher primary: investigator‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms compared with vehicle (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs vehicle

Primary: participant‐rated good/excellent control of symptoms Not measured · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand eczema) and proven by…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs vehicle

Primary: adverse events ‐ burning/itching at application site · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand eczema) and proven by…

Topical calcineurin inhibitors: tacrolimus 0.1% ointment showed no clear difference in primary: adverse events ‐ burning/itching at application site compared with vehicle (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Tacrolimus 0.1% vs vehicle

Secondary: investigator‐rated reduction in severity ‐ Not measured · people with moderate to severe nickel sulphate‐induced allergic contact dermatitis based on clinical history (hand eczema) and proven by…

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Oral mucositis (any severity) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (any severity) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Oral mucositis (severe) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in oral mucositis (severe) compared with placebo or no treatment (low certainty).

3 findings from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Oral mucositis (moderate to severe) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

It is very uncertain whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) changes oral mucositis (moderate to severe) compared with placebo or no treatment (very low certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Oral pain · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in oral pain (mean pain score, 0 to 10 scale) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Normalcy of diet (total parenteral nutrition) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in normalcy of diet (total parenteral nutrition) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) led to lower number of days of treatment with opioid analgesics compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Normalcy of diet (tube feeding) · Adults with cancer receiving treatment

Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in normalcy of diet (tube feeding) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Improvement in mucositis · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) led to higher improvement in mucositis compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

2 findings from 1 review

GM-CSF vs placebo or no treatment

Time to heal mucositis (days) · People with cancer receiving chemotherapy or radiotherapy (or both) who have oral mucositis

Granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) showed no clear difference in time to heal mucositis (days) compared with placebo or no treatment; GRADE not reported.

1 finding from 1 review