Pain ‐ Any grade · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Summary of findings for imiquimod leads to higher pain ‐ any grade compared with placebo (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Dose reductions · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Summary of findings for imiquimod leads to higher dose reductions compared with placebo (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Response to treatment at 6 months ‐ overall response · women with usual‐type vulval intraepithelial neoplasia
Summary of findings for imiquimod showed no clear difference in response to treatment at 6 months ‐ overall response compared with cidofovir (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Reoperation · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION leads to lower reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR FUSION showed no clear difference in pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR FUSION may leads to higher disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR FUSION changes operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total operative and perioperative blood loss (mL) ( · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR FUSION probably leads to higher blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in mL compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Reoperation · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR FUSION showed no clear difference in reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (high certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Amount of blood loss · patients with lumbar stenosis
It is very uncertain whether SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION changes blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in L compared with FUSION (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Reoperation · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in reoperations Number of patients requiring a revision surgery compared with FUSION (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Patient‐reported pain intensity or pain relief (VAS, NRS or categorical scale) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in pain Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Pain scores converted to 0 to 100 scale… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0 to 100 scale to allow for comparison of different disability scales (RMDQ, ODI, JOA) · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in disability Long‐term (≥ 12 months) Disability scores converted to 0… compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Operating time · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION may leads to higher operation time Duration of operation reported in minutes compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Total operative and perioperative blood loss (mL) ( · patients with lumbar stenosis
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS FOR DECOMPRESSION showed no clear difference in blood loss Amount of perioperative blood loss reported in mL compared with INTERSPINOUS SPACERS (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Function (overall) Various tools · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
Intramedullary fixation may leads to higher function or disability (overall) Various tools (Constant score and… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with 15 being the best positive score · adults (aged ≥ 16 years) with acute middle third clavicle fractures
It is very uncertain whether intramedullary fixation changes pain ‐ using the section of Constant score Scale from 0 to 15; with… compared with open reduction and internal fixation with plate (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review