Autogenic drainage vs intrapulmonary percussive ventilation (400 bpm)
- no estimate extracted1 study · 4 participantsVery low
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes death or BPD at 36 weeks PMA compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen or positive pressure support use… compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes treatment failure or need for mechanical ventilation compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes mortality, by hospital discharge compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen or positive pressure support use… compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes death or BPD at 36 weeks' PMA compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty).
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in exercise capacity ‐6MWD (m) compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (moderate certainty).
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in breathlessness ‐ CRQ dyspnoea domain compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ SGRQ compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (low certainty).
Telerehabilitation showed no clear difference in quality of life ‐ CAT compared with centre‐based (outpatient) pulmonary rehabilitation (moderate certainty).