Question · asked by 1 review
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels: BPD at 28 days
- Population
- health problem or population
- Intervention
- Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low
- Comparison
- moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels
- Outcome
- BPD at 28 days
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
What each review found
Include earlier review versionsNo studies found 1 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen use at 28 days of age ‐ not measured · health problem or population The review found no eligible studies for this question. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | no estimate extracted | Not reported | No studies found |
Summary of Findings Table ‐ Low vs moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen use at 28 days of age · health problem or population It is very uncertain whether summary of Findings Table ‐ Low changes BPD, defined as supplemental oxygen use at 28 days of age compared with moderate‐high nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels (very low certainty). Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm… (2021) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 1.1 [0.56, 2.17] | 1 study · 271 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nasal continuous positive airway pressure levels for the prevention of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | Not extracted | Not assessed |
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.