Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,248 questions in 108 reviews · Stroke

current versions
No studies 275 · 22%Ungraded 56 · 4.5%Very low 269 · 21.6%Low 349 · 28%Moderate 216 · 17.3%High 83 · 6.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Death · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsVery low
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Stroke · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsVery low
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Infection rate Short term (0 to 30 days) · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Infection rate Long term (30 to 365 days) · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Blood loss during the procedure · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Length of hospital stay · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Procedure‐related costs · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Death · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 106 participantsVery low
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Stroke · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 104 participantsVery low
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Infection rate Short term (0 to 30 days) · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Infection rate Long term (30 to 365 days) · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Blood loss during the procedure · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Length of hospital stay · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 134 participantsVery low
Microsurgical clipping vs endovascular coiling
Procedure‐related costs · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Conservative treatment vs endovascular coiling
Morbidity (GOS) · people with unruptured intracranial aneurysms
Treatments for unruptured intracranial aneurysms (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 80 participantsVery low
DPP4i vs placebo
Cardiovascular mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.91, 1.09]6 studies · 47968 participantsHigh
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Cardiovascular mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.87 [0.79, 0.95]6 studies · 46093 participantsHigh
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Myocardial infarction (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.89 [0.78, 1.01]5 studies · 42910 participantsModerate
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Stroke (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.87 [0.77, 0.98]5 studies · 42910 participantsHigh
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
All‐cause mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.88 [0.82, 0.95]7 studies · 46393 participantsHigh
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Hospitalisation for HF · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.95 [0.85, 1.06]6 studies · 36930 participantsHigh
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Worsening renal function · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.61 [0.44, 0.84]1 study · 3297 participantsLow
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Hypoglycaemia · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted5 studies · 37038 participantsLow
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Pancreatitis · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.96 [0.68, 1.35]5 studies · 40035 participantsLow
GLP‐1RA vs placebo
Fracture · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
SGLT2i vs placebo
Cardiovascular mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.82 [0.7, 0.95]5 studies · 24962 participantsModerate
DPP4i vs placebo
Myocardial infarction (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.97 [0.88, 1.08]4 studies · 42334 participantsHigh
SGLT2i vs placebo
Myocardial infarction (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.97 [0.84, 1.12]2 studies · 15266 participantsHigh
SGLT2i vs placebo
Stroke (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.12 [0.92, 1.36]2 studies · 15266 participantsModerate
SGLT2i vs placebo
All‐cause mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.84 [0.74, 0.96]5 studies · 24962 participantsModerate
SGLT2i vs placebo
Hospitalisation for HF · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.65 [0.59, 0.71]5 studies · 24962 participantsHigh
SGLT2i vs placebo
Worsening renal function · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.59 [0.43, 0.82]2 studies · 8474 participantsModerate
SGLT2i vs placebo
Hypoglycaemia · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.9 [0.75, 1.07]4 studies · 21232 participantsModerate
SGLT2i vs placebo
Pancreatitis · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.85 [0.39, 1.86]1 study · 8246 participantsLow
SGLT2i vs placebo
Fracture · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.02 [0.88, 1.18]5 studies · 24962 participantsHigh
DPP4i vs placebo
Stroke (fatal or non‐fatal) · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.87, 1.14]5 studies · 42588 participantsHigh
DPP4i vs placebo
All‐cause mortality · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.03 [0.96, 1.11]6 studies · 47968 participantsHigh
DPP4i vs placebo
Hospitalisation for HF · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 0.99 [0.8, 1.23]4 studies · 42334 participantsModerate
DPP4i vs placebo
Worsening renal function · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.88, 1.33]1 study · 16492 participantsLow
DPP4i vs placebo
Hypoglycaemia · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.11 [0.95, 1.29]3 studies · 25842 participantsModerate
DPP4i vs placebo
Pancreatitis · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1.63 [1.12, 2.37]5 studies · 47684 participantsModerate
DPP4i vs placebo
Fracture · CVD (ASCVD, HF, or both)
Dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitors, glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonists and sodium‐glucose… (2021) · Cochrane
OR 1 [0.83, 1.19]1 study · 16492 participantsModerate
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care vs alternative service
Poor outcome by the end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.77 [0.69, 0.87]26 studies · 5336 participantsModerate
Stroke ward vs general medical ward
Death or institutional care by the end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.74 [0.63, 0.87]13 studies · 2924 participantsModerate
Stroke ward vs general medical ward
Death or dependency by the end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.75 [0.64, 0.88]12 studies · 2839 participantsModerate
Stroke ward vs general medical ward
Subjective health status score Participant quality of life (Nottingham Health Profile; Quality of Life Scale) · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 535 participantsVery low
Stroke ward vs general medical ward
Patient satisfaction or preference · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Stroke ward vs general medical ward
Length of stay (days) in a hospital or institution (Analysis 2.5) · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
SMD 0.1310 studies · 2547 participantsLow
Mobile stroke team vs general medical ward
Poor outcome by the end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
OR 0.8 [0.52, 1.22]2 studies · 438 participantsLow
Mobile stroke team vs general medical ward
Death by the end of scheduled · adults with acute stroke
Organised inpatient (stroke unit) care for stroke: network meta‐analysis (2020) · Cochrane
OR 1.08 [0.71, 1.65]2 studies · 438 participantsLow