Gap finder

Search review questions

Each row is one question a systematic review asked: who, what, compared with what, and which outcome, with the effect it found and how certain that is. Words match anywhere in the field.

Limit to evidence status or GRADE (optional)

1,248 questions in 108 reviews · Stroke

current versions
No studies 275 · 22%Ungraded 56 · 4.5%Very low 269 · 21.6%Low 349 · 28%Moderate 216 · 17.3%High 83 · 6.7%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

QuestionEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.7 [0.55, 0.88]8 studies · 1025 participantsVery low
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted8 studies · 505 participantsVery low
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Adverse events: death ‐ at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted4 studies · 393 participantsUngraded
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. confusion, headache, tremor) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.61 [0.23, 1.64]4 studies · 183 participantsLow
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Adverse events: all ‐ other events ‐ not listed above (e.g. dysuria, neck pain, eye discomfort) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.47 [0.16, 1.39]4 studies · 183 participantsLow
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.62, 0.95]6 studies · 521 participantsVery low
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (other outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted17 studies · 1568 participantsUngraded
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.85 [0.59, 1.21]3 studies · 201 participantsVery low
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Adverse events: death ‐ at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.65 [0.26, 1.66]9 studies · 889 participantsVery low
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.48 [0.32, 0.7]6 studies · 511 participantsVery low
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. suicidal intentions) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.87 [0.2, 3.9]2 studies · 126 participantsVery low
Psychological therapy vs usual care and/or attention control
Adverse events: all ‐ other events ‐ not listed above (e.g. fall, too ill) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.62 [0.13, 3.09]3 studies · 254 participantsVery low
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted3 studies · 278 participantsVery low
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Adverse events: death ‐ at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and psychological therapy (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and usual care or attention control (single)
Adverse events: all ‐ gastrointestinal effects (e.g. constipation, diarrhoea) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 54 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Depression: meeting the criteria for depression at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.77 [0.64, 0.91]3 studies · 392 participantsLow
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.95 [0.69, 1.3]3 studies · 392 participantsVery low
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted15 studies · 1535 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Depression: mean scores at end of treatment (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted12 studies · 1055 participantsVery low
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Adverse events: death (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.06 [0.27, 4.16]5 studies · 487 participantsVery low
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. headache, seizures) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.5 [0.05, 5.28]3 studies · 342 participantsVery low
Pharmacological intervention and non‐invasive brain stimulation (combination) vs a pharmacological intervention and sham stimulation or usual care (single)
Adverse events: all ‐ other events ‐ not listed above (e.g. insomnia, discomfort, headaches) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 7 [0.38, 129.93]2 studies · 120 participantsVery low
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted0 studies · 0 participantsUngraded
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Adverse events: death (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.64 [0.2, 2.07]9 studies · 848 participantsVery low
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Adverse events: all ‐ central nervous system events (e.g. confusion, sedation, tremor) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.55 [1.12, 2.15]5 studies · 488 participantsVery low
Pharmacological interventions vs placebo
Adverse events: all ‐ gastrointestinal effects (e.g. constipation, diarrhoea) (secondary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.62 [1.19, 2.19]4 studies · 473 participantsVery low
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Depression: meeting study criteria for depression at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.67 [0.39, 1.14]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Non‐invasive brain stimulation vs sham non‐invasive brain stimulation and/or usual care
Depression: < 50% reduction in scale scores at end of treatment (primary outcome) · people with depression after stroke
Pharmacological, non‐invasive brain stimulation and psychological interventions, and their combination, for… (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.84 [0.52, 1.37]2 studies · 130 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Recombinant activated factor VII vs placebo/open control
Death or dependence (mRS 4–6) · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.88 [0.74, 1.05]7 studies · 1454 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) vs placebo/open control
All serious adverse events · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.75, 1.39]4 studies · 2599 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) vs placebo/open control
Death from any cause · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.02 [0.89, 1.18]8 studies · 2866 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) vs placebo/open control
Quality of life (EuroQoL health utility score) · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2349 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) vs placebo/open control
Mood · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted2 studies · 2349 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Antifibrinolytic drug(s) vs placebo/open control
Cognitive function · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extracted1 study · 2325 participantsHigh
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Death or dependence (mRS 4–6) · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.29 [1.04, 1.61]1 study · 190 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Intracerebral haemorrhage expansion by 24 hours · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.32 [0.91, 1.92]1 study · 153 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
All serious adverse events · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.46 [0.98, 2.16]1 study · 190 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Death from any cause · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.42 [0.88, 2.28]1 study · 190 participantsModerate
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Quality of life ‐ not reported · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Recombinant activated factor VII vs placebo/open control
Intracerebral haemorrhage expansion by 24 hours · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.81 [0.56, 1.16]4 studies · 220 participantsLow
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Mood ‐ not reported · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Platelet transfusion vs open control
Cognitive function ‐ not reported · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with antiplatelet drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Summary of findings table ‐ Prothrombin complex concentrates vs fresh frozen plasma
Death or dependence (mRS 4–6) · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with anticoagulant drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 1.21 [0.76, 1.9]1 study · 37 participantsVery low
Summary of findings table ‐ Prothrombin complex concentrates vs fresh frozen plasma
Intracerebral haemorrhage expansion by 24 hours · adults with acute spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage associated with anticoagulant drug use
Haemostatic therapies for stroke due to acute, spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (2023) · Cochrane
RR 0.54 [0.23, 1.22]1 study · 36 participantsVery low