Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

4,815 questions · 6,211 findings · 638 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 1,052 · 16.9%GRADE not reported 441 · 7.1%Very low 1,700 · 27.4%Low 1,651 · 26.6%Moderate 1,070 · 17.2%High 297 · 4.8%

Ranked among the 5,000 newest matching findings; add words or filters to narrow the search.

Topical ivermectin vs topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications)

Number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 · people with scabies, 5 to 80 years of ageLocation: India

It is very uncertain whether topical ivermectin 1% lotion (1 to 3 applications) changes number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 compared with topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) vs topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications)

Number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 · people with scabies, 2 to 80 years of ageLocation: India, Pakistan

Oral ivermectin 200 μg/kg (1 to 3 doses) showed no clear difference in number of participants with ≥ 1 AE ‐ week 4 compared with topical permethrin 5% cream (1 to 3 applications) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Leukopenia** grade 3 or 4 (safety population) · women with metastatic breast cancer

The intervention probably leads to higher leukopenia** grade 3 or 4 (safety population) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Overall survival ‐ trials of mTNBC participants · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention showed no clear difference in overall survival ‐ trials of mTNBC participants (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised participants) ‐ trials of mTNBC participants · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention may leads to lower progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Objective tumour response rate (assessable participants) ‐ trials of mTNBC participants · women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)

The intervention may leads to higher objective tumour response rate (assessable participants) ‐ trials of… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Nausea/vomiting* grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of platinum agent in platinum regimen · women with metastatic breast cancer

The intervention probably leads to lower nausea/vomiting* grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Anaemia grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of platinum agent in platinum regimen · women with metastatic breast cancer

The intervention leads to higher anaemia grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of platinum agent… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Hair loss grade 3 or 4 (safety population) · women with metastatic breast cancer

The intervention leads to higher hair loss grade 3 or 4 (safety population) (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs WBRT

Overall survival · Patients with brain metastases

Whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) + stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) showed no clear difference in overall survival compared with WBRT (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review