Cochrane · systematic review · CD003374

Platinum‐containing regimens for metastatic breast cancer

Egger, SJ, Willson, ML, Morgan, J, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library

Breast CancerAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
10
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
0
Included studies
NR
No studies 0 · 0%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 40%Moderate 3 · 30%High 3 · 30%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Platinum‐containing regimens for women with metastatic breast cancer unselected for triple‐negative disease

Population: women with metastatic breast cancer unselected for triple‐negative breast cancer (TNBC)
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants unselected for TNBC
HR 1.01 [0.92, 1.12]16 studies · 2531 participantsHigh
Progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised participants) ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants unselected for TNBC
HR 0.92 [0.84, 1.01]13 studies · 1745 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness
Objective tumour response rate (assessable participants) ‐ trials of metastatic breast cancer participants unselected for TNBC
RR 1.11 [1.04, 1.19]23 studies · 3252 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness

Platinum‐containing regimens for women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer

Population: women with metastatic triple‐negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Overall survival ‐ trials of mTNBC participants
HR 0.75 [0.57, 1]3 studies · 391 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Progression‐free survival/time to progression (randomised participants) ‐ trials of mTNBC participants
HR 0.59 [0.49, 0.72]3 studies · 391 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias
Objective tumour response rate (assessable participants) ‐ trials of mTNBC participants
RR 1.33 [1.13, 1.56]5 studies · 878 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, inconsistency, indirectness, publication bias

Platinum‐containing regimens and toxicity profile

Population: women with metastatic breast cancer
4 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Nausea/vomiting* grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of platinum agent in platinum regimen
RR 0.777 studies · 1441 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency
Anaemia grade 3 or 4 (safety population) by type of platinum agent in platinum regimen
RR 1.727 studies · 1441 participantsHigh
Hair loss grade 3 or 4 (safety population)
RR 1.4113 studies · 1452 participantsHigh
Leukopenia** grade 3 or 4 (safety population)
RR 1.3822 studies · 3176 participantsModerate
Downgraded: imprecision, inconsistency