Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

2,509 questions · 2,666 findings · 288 reviews

No studies found 743 · 27.9%GRADE not reported 327 · 12.3%Very low 775 · 29.1%Low 484 · 18.2%Moderate 279 · 10.5%High 58 · 2.2%

Laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion vs laparoscopic salpingectomy

Laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion vs laparoscopic salpingectomy · tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

It is very uncertain whether laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion changes laparoscopic proximal tubal occlusion vs laparoscopic salpingectomy compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid vs laparoscopic salpingectomy

Clinical pregnancy rate · tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

It is very uncertain whether transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid changes clinical pregnancy rate compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid vs laparoscopic salpingectomy

Miscarriage · tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

It is very uncertain whether transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid changes miscarriage rate compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid vs laparoscopic salpingectomy

Ectopic pregnancy · tubal disease in women due to undergo in vitro fertilisation

It is very uncertain whether transvaginal aspiration of hydrosalpingeal fluid changes ectopic pregnancy rate compared with laparoscopic salpingectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review