Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

343 questions · 347 findings · 29 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 94 · 27.1%GRADE not reported 11 · 3.2%Very low 81 · 23.3%Low 110 · 31.7%Moderate 47 · 13.5%High 4 · 1.2%

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Large retro‐equatorial recession of horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus vs simple tenotomy and resuturing of the 4 horizontal rectus muscles

Change in foveation period durations of the waveform ‐ not reported · infantile nystagmus syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Large retro‐equatorial recession of horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus vs simple tenotomy and resuturing of the 4 horizontal rectus muscles

Change in visual recognition times ‐ not reported · infantile nystagmus syndrome

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Large retro‐equatorial recession of horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus vs simple tenotomy and resuturing of the 4 horizontal rectus muscles

Change in proportion of participants with adverse effects with a probable causal link to the treatment · infantile nystagmus syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 10 participants
Very low

Summary of Findings Table ‐ Large retro‐equatorial recession of horizontal rectus muscle of 9 mm on the medial rectus and 12 mm on the lateral rectus vs simple tenotomy and resuturing of the 4 horizontal rectus muscles

Change in quality of life · infantile nystagmus syndrome

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for infantile nystagmus syndrome 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 10 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Change in BCVA from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Change in metamorphopsia from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Change in anatomical outcomes (CRT) from baseline to 6‐month · People with lamellar macular holes

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Retinal sensitivity · People with lamellar macular holes

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 34 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Vision‐related quality of life · People with lamellar macular holes

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Adverse outcomes · People with lamellar macular holes

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical interventions for lamellar macular holes 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Blindness · newborn children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Any adverse visual outcome · newborn children

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Gonococcal conjunctivitis · newborn children

It is very uncertain whether any prophylaxis changes gonococcal conjunctivitis compared with no prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.79 [0.24, 2.65]
3 studies · 8229 participants
Very low

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Chlamydial conjunctivitis · newborn children

Any prophylaxis showed no clear difference in chlamydial conjunctivitis compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.96 [0.57, 1.61]
2 studies · 4874 participants
Low

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Bacterial conjunctivitis · newborn children

Any prophylaxis showed no clear difference in bacterial conjunctivitis compared with no prophylaxis (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.84 [0.37, 1.93]
2 studies · 3685 participants
Low

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Any conjunctivitis of any aetiology · newborn children

Any prophylaxis probably leads to lower any conjunctivitis of any aetiology compared with no prophylaxis (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.65 [0.54, 0.78]
8 studies · 9666 participants
Moderate

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Conjunctivitis of unknown aetiology · newborn children

It is very uncertain whether any prophylaxis changes conjunctivitis of unknown aetiology compared with no prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.75 [0.37, 8.28]
1 study · 330 participants
Very low

Any prophylaxis vs no prophylaxis

Adverse effects · newborn children

It is very uncertain whether any prophylaxis changes adverse effects compared with no prophylaxis (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for preventing ophthalmia neonatorum 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.93
1993 participants
Very low

Intervention not reported

Undercorrected vs fully corrected spectacles · children with myopia (nearsightedness)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 142 participants
Low

Intervention not reported

Systemic 7‐methylxanthine vs placebo · children with myopia (nearsightedness)

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions to slow progression of myopia in children 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 77 participants
Moderate