evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

542 questions · 578 findings · 107 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 32 · 5.5%GRADE not reported 76 · 13.1%Very low 155 · 26.8%Low 150 · 26%Moderate 144 · 24.9%High 21 · 3.6%

Calcium phosphate agent (e.g., CPP-ACP, Ca/P-PILP, niobophosphate) vs No biomimetic remineralization (control)

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, Calcium Phosphate vs Control showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD 1.539, 95% CI -1.738 to 4.817; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HEMA/EGDMA-based desensitizer vs Fluoride agent (e.g., NaF/SDF/KF/CaF2)

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, HEMA vs Fluorine showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD 2.500, 95% CI -2.603 to 7.603; Low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flavonoids (e.g., quercetin, proanthocyanidin) vs Calcium-based agent

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, Flavonoids vs Calcium showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD 5.728, 95% CI -2.442 to 13.897; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Hydroxyapatite (e.g., nano-HAp) vs Flavonoids (e.g., quercetin, proanthocyanidin)

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, HAp showed 7.520 MPa lower 24 h bond strength than Flavonoids (MD -7.520, 95% CI -14.758 to -0.281; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mesoporous silica (SiO2) vs HEMA/EGDMA-based desensitizer

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, Silica vs HEMA showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD -1.059, 95% CI -9.024 to 6.906; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Calcium-based agent vs No biomimetic remineralization (control)

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, Calcium vs Control showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD -1.124, 95% CI -5.917 to 3.670; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Flavonoids (e.g., quercetin, proanthocyanidin) vs Mesoporous silica (SiO2)

Immediate (24 h) resin-dentin bond strength (MPa) · Artificial caries-affected dentin (ACAD) in extracted permanent human teeth (in vitro)

In the Self-Etch adhesive + chemical ACAD protocol network, Flavonoids vs Silica showed no significant difference in 24 h bond strength (MD 3.764, 95% CI -5.241 to 12.769; Moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Infliximab combined with purine analogues vs purine analogues

Clinical relapse · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

Infliximab combined with purine analogues probably leads to lower clinical relapse (at 48 weeks, CDAI of 150 or greater together with… compared with purine analogues (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Effects of extensive instructions vs simple instructions

PAR pass rate (%) ‐ Fit testing of foam earplugs (immediate) · workers exposed to noise using HPDs

Effects of extensive instructions probably leads to higher PAR pass rate (%) ‐ Fit testing of foam earplugs (immediate) compared with simple instructions (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Light vibrational forces (LVF) vs Conventional orthodontic appliance treatment

Discomfort/pain · Adolescents and adults with malocclusion undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed or removable appliances

Light vibrational forces (LVF) showed no clear difference in patient perception of pain and discomfort (VAS 0 to 100 mm),… compared with conventional orthodontic appliance treatment (placebo or no adjunct) (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review