Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Serious adverse events (number of participants) · people with early‐ or very early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery
It is very uncertain whether laser ablation changes serious adverse events (number of participants) compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (number of participants) · people with early‐ or very early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery
It is very uncertain whether transarterial embolisation plus radiofrequency ablation changes serious adverse events (number of participants) compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (number of participants) · people with early‐ or very early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery
It is very uncertain whether transarterial embolisation plus percutaneous alcohol injection changes serious adverse events (number of participants) compared with percutaneous alcohol injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (number of participants) · people with early‐ or very early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma eligible for surgery
Surgery may leads to higher serious adverse events (number of participants) compared with radiofrequency ablation (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (number of participants) · people with early‐ or very early‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma ineligible for surgery
It is very uncertain whether percutaneous alcohol injection changes serious adverse events (number of participants) compared with radiofrequency ablation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether adenovirus‐thymidine kinase with ganciclovir (ADV‐TK/GCV) plus liver… changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with liver transplantation (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether E1B‐deleted (dl1520) adenovirus changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with percutaneous ethanol injection (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Adverse events considered non‐serious · participants with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
It is very uncertain whether pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa‐Vec) plus best supportive care changes adverse events considered non‐serious (number of participants) compared with best supportive care alone (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Number of participants experiencing any serious adverse events · patients with osteoarthritis
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review