Cochrane · systematic review · CD013024

Head‐to‐head oral prophylactic antibiotic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Threapleton, CJD, Janjua, S, Fortescue, R, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2019 · Cochrane Library

AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
14
current version
GRADE rated
7
No studies
4
Included studies
NR
No studies 4 · 28.6%Ungraded 3 · 21.4%Very low 4 · 28.6%Low 3 · 21.4%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Macrolide+tetracycline versus macrolide

Population: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
5 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Quality of life, measured by CRQ (dyspnoea, fatigue, emotional function, and mastery subscales)
Macrolide+tetracycline vs macrolide
no estimate extracted1 study · 187 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
All‐cause serious adverse events 60 weeks (end of study)
Macrolide+tetracycline vs macrolide
OR 1 [0.52, 1.93]1 study · 198 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Lung function (trough FEV1) Change from baseline to 12 weeks (end of active treatment)
Macrolide+tetracycline vs macrolide
no estimate extracted1 study · 182 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
All‐cause mortality 60 weeks (end of study)
Macrolide+tetracycline vs macrolide
OR 1.63 [0.38, 7.02]1 study · 198 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Number of people experiencing one or more exacerbations, Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity (as reported by trialists), including emergence of atypical bacteria, Number of participants colonised with Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Macrolide+tetracycline vs macrolide
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Quinolone versus tetracycline

Population: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations Quinolone versus tetracycline
Quinolone vs tetracycline
OR 0.44 [0.14, 1.38]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
All‐cause mortality
Quinolone vs tetracycline
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa
Quinolone vs tetracycline
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Quinolone versus macrolide

Population: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations Quinolone versus macrolide
Quinolone vs macrolide
OR 1 [0.32, 3.1]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
All‐cause mortality
Quinolone vs macrolide
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa
Quinolone vs macrolide
no estimate extractedNRNo studies

Macrolide versus tetracycline

Population: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
3 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Number of participants experiencing one or more exacerbations Macrolide versus tetracycline
Macrolide vs tetracycline
OR 0.44 [0.14, 1.38]1 study · 50 participantsLow
Downgraded: imprecision
All‐cause mortality
Macrolide vs tetracycline
no estimate extracted1 study · 50 participantsUngraded
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa
Macrolide vs tetracycline
no estimate extractedNRNo studies