Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

193 questions · 193 findings · 70 reviews

No studies found 52 · 26.9%GRADE not reported 9 · 4.7%Very low 58 · 30.1%Low 40 · 20.7%Moderate 30 · 15.5%High 4 · 2.1%

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy vs no intervention

Serious adverse events (N) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes

Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (N) compared with no intervention (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin vs 5‐fluorouracil plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy

Serious adverse events · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas

It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin changes serious adverse events compared with 5‐fluorouracil plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Usual care vs immunosuppressive withdrawal after combination therapy

Serious adverse events · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission

It is very uncertain whether usual care changes serious adverse events compared with immunosuppressive withdrawal after combination therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted agent)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sunitinib vs atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Bevacizumab + IFN vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)

Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α vs IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic immunotherapy)

Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)

Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review