Serious adverse events (N) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (N) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (N) · people at increased risk for developing type 2 diabetes
Summary of findings: pioglitazone monotherapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (N) compared with no intervention (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events ‐ in total population randomised · critically ill patients
Early physical therapy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events ‐ in total population randomised compared with control (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of serious adverse events · adults with alopecia areata
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people with primary hypertension
It is very uncertain whether combination with potassium‐sparing diuretics changes serious adverse events compared with monotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · people with advanced biliary tract carcinomas
It is very uncertain whether gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin changes serious adverse events compared with 5‐fluorouracil plus cisplatin plus radiotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission
It is very uncertain whether usual care changes serious adverse events compared with immunosuppressive withdrawal after monotherapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events · Participants with Crohn's disease in remission
It is very uncertain whether usual care changes serious adverse events compared with immunosuppressive withdrawal after combination therapy (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Incidence of serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with alopecia areata
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Incidence of serious adverse events ‐ not reported · adults with alopecia areata
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Overall serious adverse events · people who smoke
1 finding from 1 review
Overall serious adverse events · people who smoke
Combination showed no clear difference in overall serious adverse events compared with single‐form nicotine replacement therapy (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with avelumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy + targeted… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with pembrolizumab + axitinib (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
It is very uncertain whether sunitinib changes serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab + bevacizumab (targeted agent versus immunotherapy +… (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Temsirolimus may leads to lower serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent versus classic immunotherapy) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Sunitinib probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with atezolizumab (targeted therapy versus immunotherapy) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (clear cell type)
Bevacizumab + IFN probably leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN (+ placebo) (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus… (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) · Treatment‐naïve metastatic renal cell carcinoma (any cell type)
Temsirolimus + IFN‐α may leads to higher serious adverse events (Grade 3 or 4) compared with IFN‐α (targeted agent + classic immunotherapy versus classic… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review