Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 3 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 1 · 25%High 2 · 50%

Full or partial opioid agonist maintenance vs placebo, detoxification only or psychological treatment (buprenorphine maintenance compared to taper or treatment

Retention in treatment · pharmaceutical opioid dependent people

Full or partial opioid agonist maintenance probably leads to higher retention: proportion of participants retained in treatment compared with placebo, detoxification only or psychological treatment… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Opioid agonist treatment for people who are dependent on pharmaceutical opioids 2022 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 3.02 [1.73, 5.27]
4 studies · 333 participants
Moderate

Intervention not reported

Retention in treatment · People with opioid dependence.

The intervention leads to lower retention in treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.83 [0.73, 0.95]
11 studies · 1391 participants
High

Intervention not reported

Retention in treatment · People with opioid dependence.

The intervention leads to higher retention in treatment (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Buprenorphine maintenance versus placebo or methadone maintenance for opioid dependence 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.82 [1.15, 2.9]
5 studies · 1001 participants
High

Dihydrocodeine vs buprenorphine

Treatment retention Early dropout · individuals dependent on illicit opiates

Dihydrocodeine showed no clear difference in treatment retention Early dropout compared with buprenorphine (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dihydrocodeine for detoxification and maintenance treatment in individuals with opiate use disorders 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.29 [0.99, 1.68]
2 studies · 150 participants
Low