Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

8 questions · 8 findings · 5 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 6 · 75%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 12.5%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 1 · 12.5%High 0 · 0%

Intervention not reported

Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract… 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Intervention not reported

Quality of life · people with age‐related cataract

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Phacoemulsification with posterior chamber intraocular lens versus extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE) with… 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Multifocal vs monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction

Participant‐reported outcomes: quality of life or visual function · people with cataract

1 finding from 1 review

Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 studies · 435 participants
Very low

Trifocal intraocular lenses vs bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with presbyopia

Mean quality of life or visual function (measured using Visual Function Index‐14 tool) (1 year) · participants (> 30 years) with cataract and presbyopia

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Trifocal intraocular lenses versus bifocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction among participants with… 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus viscogonioplasty

Quality of life measures · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus goniosynechialysis

Quality of life measures · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs phacoemulsification plus trabeculectomy

Quality of life measures (at 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Phacoemulsification vs laser peripheral iridotomy

Quality of life measures(measured on the EQ‐5D; higher = better) (at 12 months) · participants with primary angle‐closure glaucoma

1 finding from 1 review

Lens extraction for chronic angle‐closure glaucoma 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Moderate