Quality of life (xerostomia-related) · Adults seeking treatment for the symptom of dry mouth (xerostomia) due to any cause (e.g. medication, Sjogren's syndrome, radiotherapy,…
1 finding from 1 review
No difference between systems for overall xerostomia-related quality of life (15-item survey). Bioxtra rated better for taste; no difference for mouth 'feel'. Trial likely underpowered.
1 study · 20 participants
GRADE not reported
Quality of life (EQ‐5D‐5L) ‐ 12 weeks · treatment‐resistant depression in adults
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: quality of life · ulceration and other skin changes caused by nerve damage in leprosy
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Asthma‐related quality of life (MCID) · adolescents with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Secondary outcome: Dermatology Quality of Life measure · People with erosive oral lichen planus
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life ‐ all trials Higher scores indicate improved health‐related quality of life · prevention and treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · adults with non‐advanced colorectal cancer treated surgically or with neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy, or both
1 finding from 1 review
Health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) · COPD
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Asthma‐related quality of life (PAQLQ) · adolescents with asthma
1 finding from 1 review
Quality of life or patient satisfaction · Adolescents/teenagers undergoing orthodontic treatment
Experimental chewing adjuncts (bite wafers or chewing gum) led to lower quality of life or patient satisfaction compared with no chewing gum, placebo, or control (no adjunct); GRADE not reported.
1 finding from 1 review
Improvements in quality of life measures · boys (aged 8 to 16 years old) with subclinical cardiomyopathy in DMD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvements in quality of life measures · boys with DMD and left ventricular ejection fraction 45% or more
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvements in quality of life measures · people with DMD or BMD (ages not stated)
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvements in quality of life measures · boys with DMD, normal cardiac examination and LVEF > 55% at baseline
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Improvements in quality of life measures · patients with established cardiomyopathy in DMD
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Change in quality of life ‐ not measured · women with FPHL
1 finding from 1 review
Change in quality of life ‐ not measured · women with FPHL
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
QoL · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
Combinations of conservative treatments showed no clear difference in general quality of life: > 6 to 12 months compared with no treatment, sham treatment or verbal/written instruction (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
QoL · men with urinary incontinence following prostate surgery
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found