Cochrane · systematic review · CD012331
Lay‐led and peer support interventions for adolescents with asthma
Kew, KM, Carr, R, Crossingham, I · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2017 · Cochrane Library
AirwaysAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
7
current version
GRADE rated
4
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 14.3%Ungraded 2 · 28.6%Very low 0 · 0%Low 4 · 57.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: adolescents with asthma
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Asthma‐related quality of life (PAQLQ) | no estimate extracted | 3 studies · 578 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Asthma‐related quality of life (MCID) | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 251 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Asthma control Scale (range, score) ACT (5‐23) and ACQ (4‐16) | no estimate extracted | 2 studies · 166 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Unscheduled visits 9 months | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 84 participants | Ungraded |
Medication adherence 2.5 months | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 68 participants | Ungraded |
Smoking 3 to 4 months | no estimate extracted | 1 study · 244 participants | Low Downgraded: risk of bias |
Adverse events | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |