What do systematic reviews say?

Glutamine vs placebo

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Fresh frozen plasma vs no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Summary of findings: Antithrombin III plus heparin vs heparin

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Heparin vs low molecular weight heparin

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Ursodeoxycholic acid vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Heparin vs prostaglandin E1

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Low molecular weight heparin vs prostaglandin E1

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for prophylaxis of hepatic veno‐occlusive disease in people undergoing haematopoietic stem cell… 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 participants
  GRADE not reported

Any pharmaceutical treatment vs placebo or no treatment

• Interventions for heartburn in pregnancy 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies · 0 participants
  GRADE not reported

EGFR monoclonal antibody (cetuximab or nimotuzumab) plus standard therapy (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy) vs Standard therapy alone (radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy)

• Interventions for the treatment of oral and oropharyngeal cancers: targeted therapy and immunotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  24 to 70 months
  Only one study (Bonner 2006, 424 participants) comprehensively assessed quality of life using EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) and QLQ-H&N35; no statistically significant difference between groups for global health status or any…
  1 study · 424 participants
  GRADE not reported

Interferon-alpha (topical lozenges) vs placebo

• Interventions for managing oral ulcers in Behçet's disease 2014 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Kilic 2009 described the use of a quality of life assessment tool but did not report any quality of life data.
  1 study · 84 participants
  GRADE not reported

Electrostimulation (device) vs Placebo (sham/placebo device)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies
  No studies found

Acupuncture vs sham

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for the management of dry mouth: non‐pharmacological interventions 2013 · Cochrane All outcomes
  no estimate extracted
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 265 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for improving adherence to ocular hypotensive therapy 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Slum upgrading strategies involving physical environment and infrastructure interventions and their effects on health… 2013 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Bee propolis (one 500 mg capsule per day) vs placebo

• Systemic interventions for recurrent aphthous stomatitis (mouth ulcers) 2012 · Cochrane All outcomes

  6 months (minimum)
  Patients in the propolis group self-reported a significant improvement in their quality of life (P=0.03), based on volunteered statements of self-reported improvement.
  1 study · 19 participants
  GRADE not reported

Intervention not reported

• Interventions for supporting informal caregivers of patients in the terminal phase of a disease 2011 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 631 participants
  Low

Phenytoin mouthrinse vs placebo

Phenytoin mouthrinse led to lower quality of life compared with placebo; GRADE not reported.

• Interventions for treating oral mucositis for patients with cancer receiving treatment 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes

  7 days
  MD -15.10 [-26.04, -4.16]
  1 study · 12 participants
  GRADE not reported

Radiotherapy (morning) vs Afternoon radiotherapy

• Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: radiotherapy 2010 · Cochrane All outcomes
  Bjarnason 2009: no statistically significant difference in quality of life scores (data not reported). Morning radiotherapy was associated with significantly less weight loss after 5 months.
  1 study · 216 participants
  GRADE not reported