Cochrane · systematic review · CD010663
Surgical versus non‐surgical interventions in people with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Bettany‐Saltikov, J, Weiss, HR, Chockalingam, N, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2015 · Cochrane Library
Back and NeckAMSTAR 2: not assessed
SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
8
current version
GRADE rated
0
No studies
1
Included studies
NR
No studies 1 · 12.5%Ungraded 7 · 87.5%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%
Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.
Questions and results
Comparison
Population: Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
| Outcome | Effect | Evidence | Status / GRADE |
|---|---|---|---|
Changes in trunk balance | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Progression of scoliosis | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Cosmetic issues | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Quality of life | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Back pain | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Disability | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
Psychological issues | no estimate extracted | 0 participants | Ungraded |
CI: confidence interval | no estimate extracted | NR | No studies |