What do systematic reviews say?

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

• Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  Low

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Professional interventions for general practitioners on the management of musculoskeletal conditions 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Rosuvastatin vs placebo

• Pharmacological interventions for treating heart failure in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 39 participants
  Very low

Carvedilol vs placebo

• Pharmacological interventions for treating heart failure in patients with Chagas cardiomyopathy 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 30 participants
  Very low

Intervention not reported

• Interventions to optimise prescribing for older people in care homes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 586 participants
  Low

Metoclopramide vs ondansetron

• Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 160 participants
  Moderate

Metoclopramide vs promethazine

• Interventions for treating hyperemesis gravidarum 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 149 participants
  Low

Fractional laser vs radiofrequency

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Fractional laser vs combined chemical peeling plus needling

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Chemical peeling vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Chemical peeling vs combined chemical peeling plus any active intervention

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Chemical peeling vs needling

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Injectable fillers vs placebo or no treatment

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Fractional laser vs non‐fractional non‐ablative laser

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for acne scars 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Oral cryotherapy (ice chips, ice-cold water, ice cubes or crushed ice held in the mouth during cancer treatment) vs no intervention or control intervention (control)

• Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  High-dose melphalan-based treatment prior to HSCT (haematological cancers)
  Summary of findings 2 (melphalan/HSCT): Quality of life - '1 study assessed this outcome but the data are currently unavailable as the study report and analysis have not yet been completed' (Toro 2013; measured with…
  1 study
  GRADE not reported
• Interventions for preventing oral mucositis in patients with cancer receiving treatment: oral cryotherapy 2015 · Cochrane All outcomes

  Fluorouracil (5FU) treatment for solid cancers
  Summary of findings for the main comparison (5FU solid cancers): Quality of life - 'No studies assessed this outcome'.
  0 studies
  No studies found

Intervention not reported

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Medical interventions for fungal keratitis 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

Split‐course radiotherapy (8 fractions, 30 Gy) vs short‐course radiotherapy (16 Gy

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for the treatment of metastatic extradural spinal cord compression in adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found

High‐dose corticosteroids vs moderate‐dose or no corticosteroids

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

• Interventions for the treatment of metastatic extradural spinal cord compression in adults 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  Studies not reported
  No studies found