Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

7 questions · 7 findings · 4 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 14.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 42.9%Low 3 · 42.9%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being ‐ Intensive Pinard vs routine Pinard (outcomes

Perinatal mortality · women in established labour and their babies.

It is very uncertain whether intermittent ausculation of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal… changes perinatal mortality compared with routine Pinard (outcomes (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intermittent auscultation (IA) of fetal heart rate in labour for fetal well‐being 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.56 [0.19, 1.67]
1 study · 625 participants
Very low

Intensity of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus ‐ strict glycaemic targets vs less‐tight glycaemic targets (child (as neonate, child, adult) outcomes)

Perinatal mortality · Children (as neonate, child, adult) of women with GDM

1 finding from 1 review

Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 1499 participants
Low

Setting of BP measurement: self‐measurement vs conventional clinic measurement

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with chronic or gestational hypertension

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Technique of BP measurement: Korotkoff phase IV vs Korotkoff phase V to represent diastolic BP

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with diastolic hypertension

Technique of BP measurement: Korotkoff phase IV showed no clear difference in perinatal mortality compared with korotkoff phase V to represent diastolic BP (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Setting and techniques for monitoring blood pressure during pregnancy 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.14 [0.16, 7.92]
1 study · 220 participants
Low

Tight vs moderate glycaemic control (infant outcomes)

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with pre‐existing type 1 diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre‐existing diabetes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 45 participants
Very low

Tight‐moderate vs loose glycaemic control (infant outcomes)

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with pre‐existing type 1 diabetes

It is very uncertain whether tight‐moderate changes perinatal mortality compared with loose glycaemic control (infant outcomes) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre‐existing diabetes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.07 [0, 1.37]
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Very tight vs tight‐moderate glycaemic control (infant outcomes)

Perinatal mortality · pregnant women with pre‐existing type 1 diabetes

1 finding from 1 review

Different intensities of glycaemic control for pregnant women with pre‐existing diabetes 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 22 participants
Low