Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

96 questions · 97 findings · 33 reviews · Headline outcomes only

No studies found 29 · 29.9%GRADE not reported 4 · 4.1%Very low 28 · 28.9%Low 28 · 28.9%Moderate 7 · 7.2%High 1 · 1%

Supportive interventions for enhancing dietary intake vs comparators

All‐cause mortality · malnourished or nutritionally at‐risk adults

Supportive interventions for enhancing dietary intake probably leads to lower all‐cause mortality compared with comparators (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Self‐management interventions vs usual care

All‐cause mortality · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Self‐management interventions showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality compared with usual care (low certainty).

2 findings from 2 reviews · compare the 2 reviews

Multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) vs usual care

Anti‐cytokine, all‐cause mortality ‐ uncertain risk of bias · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component interventions (with telehealth as a component of care) changes mortality (all‐cause) overall analysis compared with usual care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings: Defibrotide vs no treatment

All‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant · Children undergoing stem cell transplant with malignant and non‐malignant diseases and risk factors for hepatic veno‐occlusive disease

Summary of findings: Defibrotide showed no clear difference in all‐cause mortality at 100 days post‐transplant ( compared with no treatment (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review