Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

45 questions · 45 findings · 1 reviews

No studies found 8 · 17.8%GRADE not reported 5 · 11.1%Very low 2 · 4.4%Low 7 · 15.6%Moderate 20 · 44.4%High 3 · 6.7%

Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3205(3 RCTs)

It is very uncertain whether the intervention changes dropouts due to adverse event ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of… (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2670(2 RCTs)

The intervention showed no clear difference in dropouts due to adverse event ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 3184(3 RCTs)

The intervention probably leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ MD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of… (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 2037(2 RCTs)

The intervention leads to lower moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD TRIPLE vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of participants: 5452(6 RCTs)

The intervention showed no clear difference in moderate to severe exacerbations ‐ HD‐ICS/LABA vs MD‐ICS/LABA№ of… (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review