Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 1 · 33.3%High 0 · 0%

nHFV vs NIPPV or NIV

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · preterm infants with respiratory distress for initial respiratory support

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive high‐frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 36 participants
Very low

nHFV vs NIPPV or NIV

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · ventilated preterm infants with planned extubation

nHFV showed no clear difference in intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 compared with nIPPV (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive high‐frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.78 [0.55, 1.1]
4 studies · 1162 participants
Moderate

nHFV vs nIPPV following failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support

Intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 · ventilated preterm infants with failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support

nHFV showed no clear difference in intraventricular haemorrhage, Papile grade 3/4 compared with nIPPV following failure of initial non‐invasive respiratory support (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive high‐frequency ventilation in newborn infants with respiratory distress 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.47 [0.02, 10.87]
1 study · 39 participants
Low