Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 2 · 50%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 25%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

SDAC vs no intervention

Incidence of mortality · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (paracetamol or not specified)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

SDAC vs syrup of ipecac

Incidence of mortality · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (anti‐inflammatory drugs, analgesics or psychotropic drugs)

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

SDAC + hospital intervention vs hospital intervention

Incidence of mortality · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (not specified, tricyclic antidepressants, combinations of different drugs or yellow…

SDAC + hospital intervention showed no clear difference in incidence of mortality compared with hospital intervention alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
Peto OR 1.04 [0.79, 1.37]
2 studies · 3425 participants
Low

MDAC + hospital intervention vs SDAC + hospital intervention

Incidence of mortality · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (carbamazepine, yellow oleander, or combinations of different drugs)

It is very uncertain whether MDAC + hospital intervention changes incidence of mortality compared with SDAC + hospital intervention (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.59 [0.21, 1.63]
2 studies · 3476 participants
Very low