MDAC + hospital intervention vs SDAC + hospital intervention: Incidence of mortality
It is very uncertain whether MDAC + hospital intervention changes incidence of mortality compared with SDAC + hospital intervention (very low certainty).
What each review found
Include earlier review versions| Finding | Effect | Studies | GRADE certainty |
|---|---|---|---|
MDAC + hospital intervention vs SDAC + hospital intervention Incidence of mortality · first aid in patients with acute oral poisoning (carbamazepine, yellow oleander, or combinations of different drugs) It is very uncertain whether MDAC + hospital intervention changes incidence of mortality compared with SDAC + hospital intervention (very low certainty). First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning (2018) · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | RR 0.59 [0.21, 1.63] | 2 studies · 3476 participants | Very low |
Findings are shown side by side, never pooled across reviews.
The reviews
| Review | Searched up to | Included studies | AMSTAR 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| First aid interventions by laypeople for acute oral poisoning 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only | Not reported | list not extracted yet | Not assessed |
Studies behind the findings
None of these reviews ties its included studies to this outcome in the data here. Cochrane reviews and reviews with headline outcomes only do not list their studies yet.
How reviews are matched to this question
Reviews word the same question differently. Four decision models (TypeSafe's Jev, Liquid AI's d1-ultra, SubQ Snap and Baseten's Elephant) judged each wording of the population, intervention, comparator and outcome against the others; two wordings count as the same when at least three of them agree and none clearly disagrees, and findings count as this question only when all four elements match. Timing, setting and subgroup never split a question: they are shown on each finding.