Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
ApaI(rs7975232) dominant model: CC+CA vs AA was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.91); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
Cdx-2(rs11568820) was reported by only one study and was not meta-analyzed; its association with caries risk is uncertain (ungraded).
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
TaqI/BglI(rs739837) dominant model: TT+TG vs GG was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 1.09); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
After removing Zhang 2006, the recessive model at BsmI(rs1544410) remained non-significant (OR 0.86); ungraded.
2 findings from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
After removing Zhang 2006, the over-dominant model at BsmI(rs1544410) remained non-significant (OR 0.85); ungraded.
2 findings from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
TaqI/BglI(rs739837) over-dominant model: TT+GG vs TG was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.89); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
Recessive model (CC vs CT+TT) at FokI(rs10735810) showed no significant association with caries (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97-1.55); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
ApaI(rs7975232) over-dominant model: CC+AA vs CA was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.91); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
FokI(rs2228570) over-dominant model: AA+GG vs AG was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 1.04); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
ApaI(rs7975232) allelic model: C vs A was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 0.89); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
Over-dominant model (CC+TT vs CT) at FokI(rs10735810) showed no significant association with caries (OR 0.83); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries · Children (<18 years) with vs without dental caries
FokI(rs2228570) allelic model: A vs G was not significantly associated with dental caries (OR 1.07); ungraded.
1 finding from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between AG genotype vs AA genotype of ENAM rs1264848 and dental caries susceptibility (AG vs AA model: OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.88-1.65); certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between TT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs6639060 and dental caries susceptibility (TT vs CC model: OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.43-2.51) in the Age group: Adults subgroup; certainty not graded.
3 findings from 1 review
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT genotype vs CC genotype of AMELX rs946252 and dental caries susceptibility (CT vs CC model: OR 2.80, 95% CI 0.93-8.43) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA + AG genotype of LTF rs1126478 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA + AG model: OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.80-1.13) in the Age group: Children subgroup; certainty not graded.
5 findings from 1 review
Show 2 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
The CT genotype of AMELX rs17878486 was associated with increased dental caries risk (CT vs CC model: OR 5.11, 95% CI 1.33-19.72) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
9 findings from 1 review
Show 6 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between GG genotype vs AA + AG genotype of ENAM rs3796704 and dental caries susceptibility (GG vs AA + AG model: OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.66-1.68) in the Control group: Low caries subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between CT + TT genotype (T-allele carriers) vs CC genotype of AMELX rs946252 and dental caries susceptibility (CT + TT vs CC model: OR 1.63, 95% CI 0.67-4.01) in the Ethnicity: Caucasian subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings
Dental caries susceptibility · Individuals assessed for dental caries (cases with caries/high caries vs. caries-free or low/very-low-caries controls)
No significant association between T allele vs C allele of AMELX rs946252 and dental caries susceptibility (T vs C model: OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.53-1.86) in the Ethnicity: Mixed subgroup; certainty not graded.
6 findings from 1 review
Show 3 more findings