evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

22 questions · 22 findings · 4 reviews · Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 6 · 27.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 4.5%Low 3 · 13.6%Moderate 12 · 54.5%High 0 · 0%

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg once weekly vs emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks

All adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg once weekly showed no clear difference in all adverse events compared with emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

All adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis probably leads to higher all adverse events compared with on‐demand therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

All adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis probably leads to higher all adverse events compared with on‐demand therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg once weekly vs emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks

Serious adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicizumab 1.5 mg/kg once weekly showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with emicizumab 3.0 mg/kg every 2 weeks (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

Serious adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 1.5 mg/kg weekly prophylaxis showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with on‐demand therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

Serious adverse events · people without inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Emicuzimab 3.0 mg/kg bi‐weekly prophylaxis showed no clear difference in serious adverse events compared with on‐demand therapy (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis vs on‐demand therapy

Adverse events ‐ All adverse events · people with inhibitors

Summary of findings table ‐ Concizumab prophylaxis showed no clear difference in adverse events ‐ All adverse events compared with on‐demand therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review