Cochrane · systematic review · CD013766

Psychological interventions for improving adherence to inhaled therapies in people with cystic fibrosis

Dawson, S, Girling, C-J, Cowap, L, et al. · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · 2023 · Cochrane Library

SoF tableOnly the outcomes this review put in its Summary of Findings table are listed (the Cochrane Handbook caps them at about seven per comparison). Its other analyses are not shown here.
Questions
12
current version
GRADE rated
10
No studies
2
Included studies
NR
No studies 2 · 16.7%Ungraded 0 · 0%Very low 4 · 33.3%Low 3 · 25%Moderate 3 · 25%High 0 · 0%

Ungraded means an effect was reported without a GRADE rating; it is not a gap. No studies means the review found nothing to answer the question. The six categories are a display order, not a score.

Questions and results

Summary of findings: psychological interventions compared with usual care

Population: children, adolescents or adults with CF
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adherence to inhaled therapies: % of prescribed inhaled therapies taken
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
MD 9.5 [8.6, 10.4]1 study · 588 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Treatment‐related adverse events Anxiety: GAD‐7 (Spitzer 2006)
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
MD 0.31 study · 535 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Treatment‐related adverse events Depression PHQ‐8 (Kroenke 2009)
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 534 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
QoL CFQ‐R (Quittner 2009)
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
MD 3.9 [1.2, 6.6]1 study · 539 participantsLow
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Lung function FEV1 % predicted
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
MD 1.41 study · 556 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness
Pulmonary exacerbations
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs usual care
no estimate extracted1 study · 607 participantsModerate
Downgraded: risk of bias, indirectness

Summary of findings: psychological interventions compared with an active comparator

Population: adults (aged 16 years and over) with CF
6 questions
OutcomeEffectEvidenceStatus / GRADE
Adherence to inhaled therapies cMPR
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extracted1 study · 95 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Treatment‐related adverse events Anxiety
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
Treatment‐related adverse events Depression
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extractedNRNo studies
QoL CFQ‐R (Quittner 2009)
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extracted1 study · 95 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Lung function FEV1 % predicted
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extracted1 study · 125 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness
Pulmonary exacerbations
Summary of findings: psychological interventions vs an active comparator
no estimate extracted1 study · 128 participantsVery low
Downgraded: risk of bias, imprecision, indirectness