Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

4 questions · 4 findings · 4 reviews · Wounds

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 75%Low 1 · 25%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Platelet‐rich growth factor + hyaluronic acid vs platelet‐rich growth factor

Adverse events · pressure ulcer

1 finding from 1 review

Dressings and topical agents containing hyaluronic acid for chronic wound healing 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 65 participants
Very low

Autologous platelet‐rich plasma vs placebo or usual care

Adverse events · adults with chronic wounds

It is very uncertain whether autologous platelet‐rich plasma changes adverse events compared with standard care with/without placebo (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Autologous platelet‐rich plasma for treating chronic wounds 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.05 [0.29, 3.88]
3 studies · 102 participants
Very low

Different types of pressure garment (Caroskin Tricot plus an adhesive silicone gel sheet vs Gecko Nanoplast

Adverse events · people with burn wounds likely to develop hypertrophic scarring

1 finding from 1 review

Pressure‐garment therapy for preventing hypertrophic scarring after burn injury 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 60 participants
Very low

Electrical stimulation (plus standard care) vs sham‐ECT plus standard care

Complications/ adverse events related to pressure ulcers (3 to 12 weeks) · people with pressure ulcers

1 finding from 1 review

Electrical stimulation for treating pressure ulcers 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
Low