Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 3 reviews · Heart

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 66.7%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Complete revascularisation vs culprit‐only revascularisation

Overall adverse events (pooled short and long term) · people with STEMI and MVD.

It is very uncertain whether complete revascularisation changes overall adverse events (pooled short and long term) compared with culprit‐only revascularisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Complete versus culprit‐only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi‐vessel disease 2017 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
OR 0.84 [0.58, 1.21]
6 studies · 4086 participants
Very low

[Radial] Oblique‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound vs long‐axis in‐plane B‐mode ultrasound

Adverse events (pain) · adults requiring radial artery catheterisation

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Exercise vs no exercise at longest available follow‐up

Serious adverse events ( · adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator

It is very uncertain whether exercise changes serious adverse events ( compared with no exercise at longest available follow‐up (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Exercise‐based cardiac rehabilitation for adult patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.81 [0.61, 1.08]
3 studies · 188 participants
Very low