evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

7 questions · 7 findings · 4 reviews · Gynaecological, Neuro-oncology and Orphan Cancer

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 2 · 28.6%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 14.3%Low 1 · 14.3%Moderate 3 · 42.9%High 0 · 0%

Laparoscopy vs laparotomy

Serious adverse events (range of outcomes) · adult women diagnosed with early stage (I to IIa) endometrial cancer undergoing surgery as primary treatment.

Laparoscopy showed no clear difference in serious adverse events (range of outcomes) compared with laparotomy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Genitourinary adverse events (grade 3 or 4) · patients with early‐stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB1, IB2 or IIA)

The intervention showed no clear difference in genitourinary adverse events (grade 3 or 4) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Haematological adverse events (grade 3 or 4) · patients with early‐stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB1, IB2 or IIA)

The intervention showed no clear difference in haematological adverse events (grade 3 or 4) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Intervention not reported

Gastrointestinal adverse events (grade 3 or 4) · patients with early‐stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages IB1, IB2 or IIA)

The intervention showed no clear difference in gastrointestinal adverse events (grade 3 or 4) (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Suprapubic catheterisation vs intermittent self‐catheterisation

Adverse events (acute complication after surgery)

It is very uncertain whether suprapubic catheterisation changes adverse events (acute complication after surgery) compared with intermittent self‐catheterisation (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review