Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

6 questions · 6 findings · 4 reviews · Eyes and Vision

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 16.7%GRADE not reported 1 · 16.7%Very low 3 · 50%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 1 · 16.7%

Psychological therapies and/or group programmes vs active control

Adverse events · adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment

1 finding from 1 review

Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
9 studies · 1453 participants
Very low

Methods of enhancing vision and/or group programmes vs active control

Adverse events · adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment

1 finding from 1 review

Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
7 studies · 660 participants
Very low

Multidisciplinary rehabilitation vs active control

Adverse events · adults (>= 18 years) with an irreversible visual impairment

1 finding from 1 review

Low vision rehabilitation for better quality of life in visually impaired adults 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 464 participants
GRADE not reported

Silicone hydrogel vs hydrogel soft contact lenses

Proportion of participants with vision‐threatening adverse events (RR < 1 favored) · Adults with refractive errors

1 finding from 1 review

Silicone hydrogel versus hydrogel soft contact lenses for differences in patient‐reported eye comfort and safety 2023 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
4 participants
Very low

Patching vs active observation

Minor adverse events Defined as any adverse event within 8 weeks of surgery that does not require further intervention · people with intermittent exotropia, aged less than 11 years

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for intermittent exotropia 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Conventional occlusion vs atropine penalization

Adverse events (reported occurrence of: mild reduction in the visual acuity of the sound eye not requiring treatment; light sensitivity; skin, lid, or conjunctival irritation) Assessed at different time points (17 weeks or 2 years). · Participants of any age with either unilateral strabismic, anisometropic, or mixed (strabismic‐refractive) amblyopia; deprivation…

1 finding from 1 review

Conventional occlusion versus pharmacologic penalization for amblyopia 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 612 participants
High