Primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse effects and serious adverse events throughout the study period · children with eczema
Cetirizine 0.5 mg/kg/d showed no clear difference in primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse… compared with placebo (18‐month intervention) (moderate certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse effects and serious adverse events throughout the study period · adults with eczema
1 finding from 1 review
Primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse effects and serious adverse events throughout the study period · adults with eczema
Cetirizine 10 mg/d showed no clear difference in primary outcome 2. Proportion of participants reporting adverse… compared with placebo (4‐week intervention) (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse events Intervention vs alpha‐glucosidase inhibitors [30 weeks] · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus
The intervention may leads to lower adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.63 [0.52, 0.76]
1 study · 2 participants
Low
Proportion of participants with treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) ‐ Leading to discontinuation during the treatment period № of participants: 36 (1 RCT) · people with newly diagnosed epilepsy
It is very uncertain whether clonazepam changes proportion of participants with treatment‐emergent adverse events… compared with carbamazepine (very low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 2.61 [0.8, 8.52]
Studies not reported
Very low
Intervention not reported
Adverse events other than development or worsening of Graves' disease (a) Hypothyroidism [measured by TSH and/or thyroid hormones] (b) Drug reactions
1 finding from 1 review
Intervention not reported
Adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse events Interventions vs thiazolidinediones [1. 6 months to 12 months] [2. 24 weeks to 52 weeks] · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus
The intervention may leads to lower adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.88 [0.78, 0.99]
1 study · 3 participants
Low
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Quality of life Drug resistance/microbial sensitivity Serious adverse events Lung function Hospitalisations Adverse events/side effects Number of participants colonised with P aeruginosa · patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
The review found no eligible studies for this question.
1 finding from 1 review
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found
Intervention not reported
Adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse events 3. Severe hypoglycaemia a. Intervention vs placebo [1a. 24 weeks] [2a. 24 weeks to 56 weeks] b. Intervention vs metformin [1b. 6 months to 4 years] [2b. 24 weeks to 4 years] [... · participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus
The intervention showed no clear difference in adverse events 1. All adverse events 2. Drop‐outs due to adverse… (low certainty).
1 finding from 1 review
RR 0.91 [0.51, 1.62]
1 study · 2 participants
Low