Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

9 questions · 9 findings · 5 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 5 · 55.6%GRADE not reported 1 · 11.1%Very low 2 · 22.2%Low 1 · 11.1%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Exposure vs no exposure to the smell and taste of milk with tube feeds

Adverse effects related to intervention · preterm infants

1 finding from 1 review

Exposure to the smell and taste of milk to accelerate feeding in preterm infants 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 2 participants
GRADE not reported

Standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids vs usual care

Adverse effects: exposure keratopathy · patients age 10 years and older with periorbital or orbital cellulitis

It is very uncertain whether standard treatment plus systemic corticosteroids changes adverse effects: exposure keratopathy compared with standard treatment alone (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Corticosteroids for periorbital and orbital cellulitis 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.2 [0.4, 3.63]
1 study · 21 participants
Very low

One type of traditional sling operation vs another traditional suburethral sling

Long‐term adverse effects Vaginal mesh or graft exposure · women with urinary incontinence

1 finding from 1 review

Traditional suburethral sling operations for urinary incontinence in women 2020 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
3 studies · 421 participants
Very low

Effects of instructions vs No special instructions (control)

Adverse effects · workers exposed to noise using earplugs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Effects of extensive instructions vs simple instructions

Adverse effects · workers exposed to noise using HPDs

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers’ exposure to noise 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Powered air‐purifying respirators vs no respiratory protection

Adverse effects · asbestos workers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Personal protective equipment for preventing asbestos exposure in workers 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Full‐face filtering masks vs no respiratory protection

Adverse effects · asbestos workers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Personal protective equipment for preventing asbestos exposure in workers 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Supplied air respirators vs no respiratory protection

Adverse effects · asbestos workers

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Personal protective equipment for preventing asbestos exposure in workers 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

One type of coverall vs another type of coverall

Adverse effects: core body temperature (change from before to after work) · asbestos workers

1 finding from 1 review

Personal protective equipment for preventing asbestos exposure in workers 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
1 study · 11 participants
Low