Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews · Gynaecology and Fertility

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 1 · 50%Moderate 1 · 50%High 0 · 0%

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure

Vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional MUS vs vaginal repair alone · continent women with POP

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in vaginal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery:… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.69 [0.47, 1]
1 study · 220 participants
Moderate

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure vs no concomitant continence procedure

Abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence surgery: additional Burch colposuspension vs sacrocolpopexy alone · continent women with POP

Vaginal or abdominal POP surgery with concomitant continence procedure showed no clear difference in abdominal POP surgery with or without concomitant continence… compared with no concomitant continence procedure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgery for women with pelvic organ prolapse with or without stress urinary incontinence 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.31 [0.19, 9.01]
2 studies · 379 participants
Low