Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

2 questions · 2 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 2 · 100%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Transepithelial CXL vs epithelium‐off CXL

Proportion of participants whose keratoconus remained stable—at 12 months · participants with keratoconus

1 finding from 1 review

Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 131 participants
Very low

Transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis vs epithelium‐off CXL

Proportion of participants whose keratoconus remained stable—at 24 months · participants with progressive keratoconus

It is very uncertain whether transepithelial CXL using iontophoresis changes proportion of participants whose keratoconus remained stable—at 24… compared with epithelium‐off CXL (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Transepithelial versus epithelium‐off corneal crosslinking for progressive keratoconus 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.92 [0.76, 1.12]
1 study · 31 participants
Very low