Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

3 questions · 3 findings · 3 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 33.3%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 33.3%Low 1 · 33.3%Moderate 0 · 0%High 0 · 0%

Surgical debridement via an endoscopic method vs conventional 'open' surgical debridement

Serious adverse events: life‐threatening/ hospitalisation · adults with surgical wounds

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Debridement for surgical wounds 2024 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

Surgical portosystemic shunts vs devascularisation with splenectomy

Serious adverse events · people with hepatosplenic schistosomiasis

It is very uncertain whether surgical portosystemic shunts changes serious adverse events compared with devascularisation with splenectomy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Surgical portosystemic shunts versus devascularisation procedures for prevention of variceal rebleeding in people with… 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.26 [0.44, 11.7]
2 studies · 154 participants
Very low

Surgical interventions (exploration and decompression / external neurolysis, internal neurolysis, neurorrhaphy / direct repair, neuroma excision, anastomosis, autologous or allograft nerve grafting or tubulization) vs conservative interventions

Serious adverse events · Children and adolescents with femoral shaft fractures

Surgical interventions may leads to higher serious adverse events compared with conservative interventions (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Interventions for treating femoral shaft fractures in children and adolescents 2014 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 2.39 [1.1, 5.17]
4 studies · 264 participants
Low