Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

14 questions · 14 findings · 2 reviews

No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 2 · 14.3%Very low 4 · 28.6%Low 3 · 21.4%Moderate 5 · 35.7%High 0 · 0%

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Death (before hospital discharge) or BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age if born < 32 weeks' gestation, or 28 days if born ≥ 32 weeks' gestation) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in death (before hospital discharge) or BPD(supplemental… compared with continuous positive airway pressure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age if born < 32 weeks' gestation, or 28 days if born ≥ 32 weeks' gestation) · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in BPD (supplemental oxygen/respiratory support at 36 weeks'… compared with continuous positive airway pressure (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Duration of any form of respiratory support (any form of non‐invasive respiratory support with or without supplemental oxygen) · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))
1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow probably leads to higher treatment failure within 72 hours of trial entry compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry · preterm infants requiring primary respiratory support

Nasal high flow showed no clear difference in mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of trial entry compared with continuous positive airway pressure (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Treatment failure · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) changes treatment failure compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Adverse events ‐ nasal trauma · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) changes adverse events ‐ nasal trauma compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

HFNC vs continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP)

Adverse events ‐ abdominal overdistention · respiratory support in term infants (infants ≥ 37 weeks gestational age to the end of the neonatal period (up to 1 month postnatal age))

It is very uncertain whether summary of findings table ‐ High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) changes adverse events ‐ abdominal overdistention compared with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review