Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

10 questions · 10 findings · 2 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewest Highest certainty Download CSV

No studies found 1 · 10%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 3 · 30%Low 4 · 40%Moderate 2 · 20%High 0 · 0%

Closest answers

The findings closest to your search, judged one by one by TypeSafe's Jev model.

Direct match · question page
- Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) vs oxygen therapy · Hospital mortality
  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.71]
  1 study · 209 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) vs oxygen therapy · Rate of tracheal Intubation
  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.25 [0.08, 0.83]
  2 studies · 269 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- NPPV vs SMC · HOSPITAL MORTALITY
  Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.65 [0.51, 0.82]
  21 studies · 2484 participants
  Low
Direct match · question page
- Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) vs oxygen therapy · ICU length of stay
  Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 269 participants
  Very low
Direct match · question page
- NPPV vs SMC · ADVERSE EVENTS
  Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  11 studies · 2038 participants
  Low

NPPV vs SMC

Hospital mortality · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

NPPV may leads to lower HOSPITAL MORTALITY compared with SMC (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.65 [0.51, 0.82]
21 studies · 2484 participants
Low

NPPV vs SMC

ETI RATE · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

NPPV probably leads to lower ETI RATE compared with SMC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.49 [0.38, 0.62]
20 studies · 2449 participants
Moderate

NPPV vs SMC

Myocardial infarction · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

NPPV showed no clear difference in ACUTE MI INCIDENCE compared with SMC (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 1.03 [0.91, 1.16]
5 studies · 1313 participants
Moderate

NPPV vs SMC

Length of hospital stay · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 1714 participants
Very low

NPPV vs SMC

Duration of ICU stay · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
6 studies · 587 participants
Very low

NPPV vs SMC

Intolerance to allocated treatment · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

The review found no eligible studies for this question.

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
Studies not reported
No studies found

NPPV vs SMC

Adverse events · patients with cardiogenic pulmonary oedema

1 finding from 1 review

Non‐invasive positive pressure ventilation (CPAP or bilevel NPPV) for cardiogenic pulmonary oedema 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
11 studies · 2038 participants
Low

NPPV vs oxygen therapy

Hospital mortality · adults (aged > 17 years) with acute respiratory failure after upper abdominal surgery

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) showed no clear difference in hospital mortality compared with oxygen therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.14 [0.01, 2.71]
1 study · 209 participants
Low

NPPV vs oxygen therapy

Rate of intubation · adults (aged > 17 years) with acute respiratory failure after upper abdominal surgery

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) may leads to lower rate of tracheal Intubation compared with oxygen therapy (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
RR 0.25 [0.08, 0.83]
2 studies · 269 participants
Low

NPPV vs oxygen therapy

Duration of ICU stay · adults (aged > 17 years) with acute respiratory failure after upper abdominal surgery

It is very uncertain whether noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) changes ICU length of stay compared with oxygen therapy (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure following upper abdominal surgery 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
no estimate extracted
2 studies · 269 participants
Very low