What do systematic reviews say?

Multi‐component intervention vs control

• Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 374 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs control

Multi‐component intervention may leads to lower hospital service utilisation: number of people admitted to hospital… compared with control (low certainty).

• Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.37 [0.22, 0.63]
  2 studies · 877 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs control

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes exacerbations: number of people experiencing moderate or severe… compared with control (very low certainty).

• Interventions to improve adherence to pharmacological therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) 2021 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  OR 0.97 [0.71, 1.31]
  1 study · 734 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with low back pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.93 [0.69, 1.27]
  3 studies · 107 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with upper back pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.88 [0.4, 1.96]
  2 studies · 40 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

Multi‐component intervention showed no clear difference in proportion of participants with neck pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (low certainty).

• Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 1 [0.76, 1.32]
  3 studies · 115 participants
  Low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

It is very uncertain whether multi‐component intervention changes proportion of participants with shoulder pain/discomfort compared with no intervention (very low certainty).

• Workplace interventions for increasing standing or walking for decreasing musculoskeletal symptoms in sedentary workers 2019 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.83 [0.12, 5.8]
  2 studies · 66 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

• Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  3 studies · 573 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

• Workplace interventions for reducing sitting at work 2018 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 518 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

• Organisational interventions for improving wellbeing and reducing work‐related stress in teachers 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 1102 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

• Organisational interventions for improving wellbeing and reducing work‐related stress in teachers 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 881 participants
  Very low

Multi‐component intervention vs no intervention

• Organisational interventions for improving wellbeing and reducing work‐related stress in teachers 2015 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  1 study · 781 participants
  Very low

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention probably leads to lower incidence of delirium validated instruments1 compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.69 [0.59, 0.81]
  7 studies · 1950 participants
  Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  4 studies · 244 participants
  Very low

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  2 studies · 67 participants
  Low

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  no estimate extracted
  6 studies · 1920 participants
  Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention showed no clear difference in return to independent living compared with usual care (moderate certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.95 [0.85, 1.06]
  4 studies · 1116 participants
  Moderate

A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention vs usual care

It is very uncertain whether A multi‐component delirium prevention intervention changes inpatient mortality compared with usual care (very low certainty).

• Interventions for preventing delirium in hospitalised non‐ICU patients 2016 · Cochrane Headline outcomes only
  RR 0.9 [0.56, 1.43]
  3 studies · 859 participants
  Very low