Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

139 questions · 143 findings · 11 reviews

No studies found 17 · 11.9%GRADE not reported 8 · 5.6%Very low 41 · 28.7%Low 56 · 39.2%Moderate 21 · 14.7%High 0 · 0%

Oral misoprostol vs placebo/no treatment

Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol vs placebo/no treatment

Apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes · women with ruptured membranes in the third trimester for induction of labour.

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol changes apgar score less than 7 at 5 minutes compared with placebo/no treatment (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Women not using/receiving misoprostol at birth · women in the third stage of labour

It is very uncertain whether advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for… changes women not using/receiving misoprostol at birth compared with usual (or standard) care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for postpartum self‐administration vs usual care

Inappropriate use (or misuse) of misoprostol · women in the third stage of labour

It is very uncertain whether advance misoprostol distribution/provision to pregnant women for… changes inappropriate use (or misuse) of misoprostol compared with usual (or standard) care (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Sublingual misoprostol vs vaginal misoprostol

Women's dissatisfaction with the procedure · women undergoing first trimester abortion

Sublingual misoprostol showed no clear difference in women's dissatisfaction with the procedure compared with vaginal misoprostol (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly vs oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly

Vaginal birth within 24 hours · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes vaginal birth within 24 hours compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly vs oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly

Caesarean section · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes caesarean section compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly vs oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly

Oxytocin augmentation · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes oxytocin augmentation compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly vs oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly

Uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes · women in the third trimester for induction of labour with intact membranes

It is very uncertain whether oral misoprostol one‐ to two‐hourly changes uterine hyperstimulation without fetal heart rate changes compared with oral misoprostol four‐ to six‐hourly (very low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review