evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

23 questions · 27 findings · 1 reviews · Headline outcomes only

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 5 · 18.5%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 1 · 3.7%Low 4 · 14.8%Moderate 6 · 22.2%High 11 · 40.7%

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐positive rate · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Rate of biopsies · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher rate of biopsies compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: cohort studies · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental cancer detection in women with dense breasts: RCT compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Incremental detection of invasive cancers · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in incremental detection of invasive cancers compared with mammography alone (low certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Interval cancer · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in interval cancer compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐positive rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Biopsy rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher biopsy rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Incremental cancer detection for women with non‐dense breasts: cohort studies · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to higher incremental cancer detection for women with non‐dense breasts: RCT compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

2 findings from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Interval cancer · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography showed no clear difference in interval cancer compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐positive rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher false‐positive rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Biopsy rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher biopsy rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

Incremental cancer detection: cohort studies · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography leads to higher incremental cancer detection: RCT compared with mammography alone (high certainty).

2 findings from 1 review