evidencegaps
Findings

What do systematic reviews say?

Refine by population, intervention, comparison or outcome
More filters
Evidence found and GRADE certainty

3 questions · 3 findings · 1 reviews

Sort:Best matchNewestHighest certaintyDownload CSV
No studies found 0 · 0%GRADE not reported 0 · 0%Very low 0 · 0%Low 0 · 0%Moderate 3 · 100%High 0 · 0%

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate · s of women with dense and non‐dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate in women with dense breasts · breast cancer screening in women at average risk with dense breasts

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography vs mammography alone

False‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts · breast cancer screening (non‐dense breasts)

Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography probably leads to lower false‐negative rate in women with non‐dense breasts compared with mammography alone (moderate certainty).

1 finding from 1 review